Does the project pay?We can show you themath in two weeks.
Dsider models your project from feedstock to offtake with the physics built in, and prices every design, incentive, and contract choice in dollars, so the investment case is one you can defend to a lender, a board, or a partner
Most clean-tech projects are
decided in a spreadsheet.
Which pathway. Which capture rate. Which offtake structure. Whether the incentive actually qualifies. Most teams answer those in a workbook that one person built, with a process model sitting in a different file and a financial model in a third. It holds until a lender or a partner asks a question the workbook wasn't built for.
One workbook, one author.
When they leave, so does the logic. When inputs change, someone rebuilds it by hand.
Technology & finance in different rooms.
The process engineer's mass and energy balance and the lender's return model rarely agree on the same page.
Everything keeps moving.
Power prices, feedstock costs, carbon intensity scores, and incentive rules shift quarter to quarter, and each shift triggers a rebuild.
From feedstock to offtake, in one model.
Dsider simulates the process, lays your costs, incentives, and offtake terms on top, and prices every choice in dollars and carbon, with the rationale recorded.
Physics behind every number.
Your engineers can inspect every assumption. Your investors know the technology has been modeled, not assumed.
An audit trail for every decision.
Scenario, assumptions, outcome, and the math behind each, one click away, ready for diligence.
Scenarios that re-run themselves.
When a price, an input, or a policy changes, the case is re-priced in minutes instead of rebuilt by hand.
Where the value is hiding
One mid-cap operator's own business case put better daily operating and planning decisions at $0.8 to $1.7 million of EBITDA per plant per year.
The investment decision.
Capex, operating cost, carbon intensity, incentives, and offtake in one model, with the sensitivities that decide whether the project clears the bar. Know what has to be true for it to pay.
The design choice.
Compare pathways, configurations, and scale side by side, with the physics checked, before engineering spend is committed. For capture projects, that includes capture rate versus cost.
The incentive and offtake structure.
Price, tenor, tax credit qualification, and carbon intensity score, converted into value per unit. See what a contract term is worth before you sign it.
When the inputs move.
Power, feedstock, or policy changes. Dsider re-prices the case in minutes and shows which assumption moved the answer.
Two weeks to a defined problem. Ninety days to a number.
You know what you're buying before you buy it.
Discovery.
Send us the production data, well files, and facility exports you already have. Together we pick the one decision worth solving first. A short, paid engagement.
Prove the number.
We build the model on your data. Your lead reservoir or production engineer reviews it. At day 90 you have a directional value number your CFO can check.
Decide with your eyes open.
If the number isn't there, you've spent a few hours over the quarter reviewing our work. If it is, you sign knowing exactly what you're buying.
No live integration required to start. Our team builds. Yours reviews.
Find out in two weeks →Numbers that hold up
in every room.
A first-principles simulation with every assumption visible and editable. Put your lead process engineer in the first review and verify the physics.
An AI story with a dollar sign: models grounded in physics that show exactly how the return was built, case by case.
Want to try it first?
A free, self-serve version of Dsider is available now. Build a first case on your own, see how the model prices your project, and reach out to us when you want a deeper look.